Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 9 results ...

Bowen, P A, Edwards, P J and Cattell, K (2009) Value management practice in South Africa: the built environment professions compared. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1039–57.

Bryde, D J and Volm, J M (2009) Perceptions of owners in German construction projects: congruence with project risk theory. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1059–71.

Doloi, H (2009) Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1099–109.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: relational partnerships; structural modelling equation; project success; procurement methods
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903286564
  • Abstract:
    The advantages of relational partnerships as an alternative project delivery mechanism to the traditional methods have yet to be realized by the wider construction industry. In relational partnerships, all parties work together as a cohesive team to achieve an agreed outcome. However, an accurate estimation of the underlying factors associated with the relationships of these parties and assessment of their impacts on partnering success are difficult to achieve. By identifying three major factors, communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management, this research unfolded the relational links between these factors and analysed the impacts in the context of the relational partnering success. Based on a questionnaire survey and the structural equation modelling technique, results identified communication as the single most influencing factor impacting on relational partnering success. While trust and confidence were found to be mutually inclusive for effective communication, it was found to have direct influence on developing capability for joint risk management within the partnering organizations. This finding diverges from the widely accepted view across the Australian construction industry that partnering is built on trust and confidence only and any risks associated in projects are best dealt with by means of joint responsibility without any problems.

Liu, S-S and Wang, C-J (2009) Two-stage profit optimization model for linear scheduling problems considering cash flow. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1023–37.

McGrath-Champ, S and Rosewarne, S (2009) Organizational change in Australian building and construction: rethinking a unilinear ‘leaning’ discourse. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1111–28.

Nguyen, N H, Skitmore, M and Wong, J K W (2009) Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries: a study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1129–40.

Pietroforte, R, Gregori, T and Falagario, M (2009) The changing input structure of the US construction industry: a longitudinal analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1089–98.

Tseng, C-L, Zhao, T and Fu, C C (2009) Contingency estimation using a real options approach. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1073–87.

Xia, B, Chan, A P C and Yeung, J F Y (2009) Identification of key competences of design-builders in the construction market of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), 1141–52.